Maya Angelou's autobiography, I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, should not be removed from school curriculum, especially at the high school level. My opponent and others like him may refer to this brilliantly written account of a great woman's life as ‘pornographic'. It is true that the autobiography has been removed from the studies of at least one school. However, the book's paltry ‘controversial' content is completely overpowered by it's true message of triumph over animosity. And the scintillating, palpable language Angelou uses to convey her story is certainly not an enigma to readers. Critics from across the United States have agreed with both of these opinions. One review company raves that, "Maya Angelou is a natural writer with an inordinate sense of life and she has written and exceptional autobiographical narrative...a beautiful book-an unconditionally involving memoir for our time or any time." It would appear that this company has practically declared Maya Angelou's work a classic. Is this not appropriate for a high school setting? A critic from Newsweek states that Angelou's book, "regularly throws out rich, dazzling images which delight and surprise with their simplicity." However there is most certainly more to this book than excellent language. In this autobiography, you will find a young girl's struggle to beat inequity, to taste freedom, to be viewed as an equal. You will find the story of suffering and grief. You will find the story of s struggle, an inspirational struggle, which carried Maya Angelou to the mountain she stands upon today. The same affluent reviewer concludes, "...Miss Angelou's book is more than a tour de force of language and the story of childhood suffering: it quietly and gracefully portrays and pays tribute to the courage, dignity and endurance of the small, rural community in which she spent most of her early years... one has to read it [the book] to appreciate it's sensitivity and life." A true account that pays tribute to courage, dignity and endurance? More than just a story of childhood calamity? Sensitivity? Life? Does this book sound like filth to you? Is this book, this ‘horrible, awful, unspeakable' book soud like what we should really be protecting young adults from? The idea is ludicrous. Maya Angelou's autobiography depicts the minorities onerous struggle to survive in a lurid world of prejudice. Maya gracefully eludes sexism, racism and her other childhood problems. Maya learns that by infusing the power of language into her character, she can escape her world of aversion. Maya discovered power in herself and developed inner strength. The ‘controversial' parts of this book are not even required reading, at least in Niskayuna and most likely everywhere else as well. No one is forced into any in depth discussions regarding the explicit details of Maya's rape. Also, keep in mind, this part and the rest of the book is depicted and seen through the eyes of a benign young girl barely able to comprehend her situation. The excellent way the school systems handle this type of book should not raise any brouhaha whatsoever. I believe protective parents should worry more about what their children watch on television, if anything, rather than worry about this account. I'm sure that once you see the facts revealed in the coming debate, you will incur my the opinion I am defending. Please do not make any perfunctory decisions, look at the entire issue and the entire book. Thank you.